XM vs XTB
A side-by-side evidence check. Missing values stay missing; a minimum spread is not a typical trading cost.
| Compare evidence | XM | XTB |
|---|---|---|
| Entity | Trading Point MENA Limited | XTB MENA Limited |
| Licence | F003484 | F006316 |
| Scope | Arranging and matched-principal dealing; retail and client-assets endorsements | Arranging and matched-principal dealing; retail and client-assets endorsements |
| AED currency | UNKNOWN — not verified | UNKNOWN — not verified |
| EUR/USD pips | UNKNOWN — not verified | UNKNOWN — not verified |
| Minimum, USD | UNKNOWN — not verified | UNKNOWN — not verified |
| Client-money location | UNKNOWN — not verified | UNKNOWN — not verified |
The register identifies one group entity. Confirm that the registration journey actually uses it, and match Standard, Micro or other account naming to the applicable contract specification. Separate a cash-equity account from a CFD account and check the contracting company for each. Group-wide instrument counts do not prove that every instrument is available through this entity.
What this comparison can establish
The captured sources establish only the fields shown. They do not establish which broker is cheapest for your account or where your individual funds will be held. Ask both firms for the same instrument, account type, trade size and holding period.
Compare a fee scenario →What to resolve for XM and XTB
Both profiles have captured values for named source entity. These values need matching account scope before any price comparison.
At least one side still lacks: published platforms, AED account currency, EUR/USD spread, commission, client-money location. Request these details from both firms for the same UAE-resident account and instrument. Missing values cannot establish a winner.